 |
| Paulo Cezar Filho, Jornalheiros, 2014. Código FEN: 8/B7/N2pp2p/2p1k3/7Q/8/B3K3/8 w - - 0 1. |
As Brancas jogam e dão xeque-mate em 3 lances!
(White to play and give checkmate in 3 moves!)
PCFilho
Páginas
▼
quinta-feira, 27 de fevereiro de 2014
Xadrez - Mate em 3! (Paulo Cezar Filho)
As Brancas jogam e dão xeque-mate em 3 lances!
(White to play and give checkmate in 3 moves!)
PCFilho
8 comentários:
Regras para postar comentários:
I. Os comentários devem se ater ao assunto do post, preferencialmente. Pense duas vezes antes de publicar um comentário fora do contexto.
II. Os comentários devem ser relevantes, isto é, devem acrescentar informação útil ao post ou ao debate em questão.
III. Os comentários devem ser sempre respeitosos. É terminantemente proibido debochar, ofender, insultar e/ou caluniar quaisquer pessoas e instituições.
IV. Os nomes dos clubes devem ser escritos sempre da maneira correta. Não serão tolerados apelidos pejorativos para as instituições, sejam quais forem.
V. Não é permitido pedir ou publicar números de telefone/Whatsapp, e-mails, redes sociais, etc.
VI. Respeitem a nossa bela Língua Portuguesa, e evitem escrever em CAIXA ALTA.
Os comentários que não respeitem as regras acima poderão ser excluídos ou não, a critério dos moderadores do blog.
Este comentário foi removido pelo autor.
ResponderExcluir1 Bb1!! 1-0
ResponderExcluir1 ... c4?? 2 Qd4#
1 ... d5?? 2 Bb8#
1 ... Kd5?? 2 Qe4#
1 ... h5 2 Nb4!!
(2 ... cxb4/c4 3 Qd4#)
(2 ... d5 3 Bb8#)
Well done, Jake! 1. Bb1!! is the key move.
ResponderExcluir1. Bb1!! c4
2. Qd4#
1. Bb1!! d5
2. Bb8#
1. Bb1!! Kd5
2. Qe4#
When Black replies with 1. ... h5 I chose 2. Bc2!! as my second move:
1. Bb1!! h5
2. Bc2!! c4
3. Qd4#
1. Bb1!! h5
2. Bc2!! d5
3. Bb8#
1. Bb1!! h5
2. Bc2!! Kd5
3. Qe4#
But 2. Nb4!! also works, as you have showed:
1. Bb1!! h5
2. Nb4!! cxb4
3. Qd4#
1. Bb1!! h5
2. Nb4!! c4
3. Qd4#
1. Bb1!! h5
2. Nb4!! d5
3. Bb8#
2. Bd3!!, 2. Bg6!! and 2. Bh7!! would also work.
I have composed this three-mover by myself, so I would like your opinion: was it a good one? Could it be better? :)
Technically it's valid, as its key move is unique (in other words, there's only one possible key move). The issue I have with it is that there are so many different possible second moves that work (granted, all of them except for the knight move share a common theme, but whatever). I think the next three-mover you compose should make sure that there's only one second move that works, or, if there are two or more, that they share a common theme.
ResponderExcluirTruth be told, I saw the knight move before I saw any of those bishop moves. I saw that 2 Nb4 completely immobilizes the king, so I went with that. Plus, I like sacrificial moves A LOT.
ResponderExcluirThank you for your analysis and tips, Jake.
ResponderExcluirI am a beginner in this chess composing world. So, I still have a lot to learn.
For this problem, I was trying to compose a two-mover, when I realized a three-mover was just ready. :)
Next month I will try to come up with another problem, 2- or 3-mover.
You're probably a better chess composer than I am; I completely SUCK when it comes to composing chess problems (though I'm fairly decent at solving them XD)
ResponderExcluirJake, you are indeed a very good solver of chess problems. And I really appreciate all the attention you give to my efforts.
ResponderExcluirI'm already working on my next problem. I hope I can finish it soon. :)